TEACHING TO READ: AN INTERESTING INTERFACE BETWEEN NEUROSCIENCE AND EDUCATION

Main Article Content

Antonio Calvani
Paola Damiani
Sergio Miranda
Lorena Montesano
Luciana Ventriglia

Abstract

The work presents the results of a large experimentation carried out in Italy, which aimed to verify the advantages and sustainability of a rigorous phono-syllabic programme (Alfabeto140) compared to programmes that include marked traits of global and ideo-visual methods. The evaluation made use of tools in line with the different evolutionary phases of the reading and writing process, assessing at the pre-test the skills related to the prerequisites of reading and writing, and at the post-test those related to the acquisition of the alphabetical phase. The experimentation shows how the experimental group achieves significantly better results over 7 months of activity than the control group, with a more consistent systematic reduction of the subjects initially at risk for reading and writing difficulties, and an excellent appreciation by the teachers who have tried the programme.

Article Details

Section
Articles - Special Issue

References

Abrahamson, D., Flood, V. J., Miele, J. A., & Siu, Y. T. (2019). Enactivism and ethnomethodological conversation analysis as tools for expanding Universal Design for Learning: The case of visually impaired mathematics students. ZDM Mathematics Education, 51(2), 291-303. doi: 10.1007/s11858-018-0998-1

Amso, D., & Sherif, G. (2015). The attentive brain: insights from developmental cognitive neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci, 16, 606-619. doi: 10.1038/nrn4025

Caldarola, N., Perini, N., & Cornoldi, C. (2012). DLC. Una prova di decisione lessicale per la valutazione collettiva delle abilità di lettura. Dislessia, 9, 89-104. Retrieved from https://www.airipa.it/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Caldarola-et-al-1-12-1.pdf

Calvani, A., Damiani, P., Montesano, L., Miranda, S., & Ventriglia, L. (2021). Evidenze scientifiche ed insegnamento della lettura. Perché una alfabetizzazione fono-sillabica strutturata è necessaria per tutti i bambini. Giornale Italiano dei Disturbi del Neurosviluppo. Buone prassi per la scuola, la clinica e la ricerca, 6(3), 14-33. Retrieved from https://sapie.it/wp/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Risultati-programma-ALFABETO.pdf

Calvani, A., & Ventriglia, L. (2017). Insegnare a leggere ai bambini. Gli errori da evitare. Roma, IT: Carocci.

Calvani, A., Ventriglia, L., Damiani, P., & Zanaboni, B. (2022). Alfabeto: Libro dell’insegnante. Torino, IT: SApIE.

Carretti, B., & Zamperlin, C. (2010). La relazione fra lettura strumentale, comprensione da ascolto e comprensione del testo in studenti italiani. Ricerche di Psicologia, 13, 361-373. doi: 10.3280/RIP2010-003003

Churches, E., Dommett, J., Devonshire I. M., Hall, R., Higgins, S., & Korin, A. (2020). Translating Laboratory Evidence into Classroom Practice with Teacher-Led Randomized Controlled Trials - A Perspective and Meta-Analysis. Mind, Brain and Education, 14(3), 292-302. doi: 10.1111/mbe.12243

Coe, R. (1999). Manifesto for Evidence-Based Education. Retrieved from https://f.hubspotusercontent30.net/hubfs/5191137/attachments/ebe/manifesto-for-ebe.pdf

Cornoldi, C., Miato, L., Molin, A., & Poli, S. (2009). PRCR-2/2009. Prove di prerequisito per la diagnosi delle difficoltà di lettura e scrittura. Firenze, IT: Giunti O.S.

Davies, P. (1999). What is evidence-based education? British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2), 108-121. doi: 10.1111/1467-8527.00106

Dehaene, S. (2009). I neuroni della lettura. Milano, IT: Raffaello Cortina.

Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense. New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.

Educational Endowment Foundation. (2021). Cognitive Science Approaches in the Classroom: A Review of the Evidence. Retrieved from https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/evidence-summaries/evidence-reviews/cognitive-science-approaches-in-the-classroom

Franceschi, S., Savelli, E., & Stella, G. (2011). Identificazione precoce dei soggetti a rischio DSA ed efficacia di un intervento abilitativo metafonologico. Dislessia, 3(8), 247-266.

Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. Patterson, J. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Neurological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 301- 330). Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum

Geake, J. (2008). Neuromythologies in education. Educational Research, 50(2), 123–133. doi: 10.1080/00131880802082518

Geake, J. G. (2009). The brain at school: Educational Neuroscience in the classroom. New York, US: Open University Press.

Gagné, R., & Briggs, L. J. (1974). Principles of instructional design. New York, NY, US: Holton.

Gola, G., Angioletti. L., Cassioli, F., & Balconi, M. (2022). The Teaching Brain: Beyond the Science of Teaching and Educational Neuroscience. Front. Psychol., 13, 823-832. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.823832

Goswami, U., Gombert, J. E., & De Barrera, L. F. (1998). Children’s orthographic representations and linguistic transparency: Nonsense word reading in English, French, and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19(1), 19-52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400010560

Goswami, U. (2006). Neuroscience and education: from research to practice? Nature reviews neuroscience 7(5), 406-413. doi: 10.1038/nrn1907

Hargreaves, D. H. (1996). Teaching as a Research-Based Profession: Possibilities and Prospects. London, UK: Teacher Training Agency.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analysis relating to achievement. New York, NY, US: Routledge.

Higgins, S., Katsipataki, M., Villanueva-Aguilera, A. B., Coleman, R., Henderson, P., Major, L. E., … Mason, D. (2016). The Sutton Trust Education Endowment Foundation teaching and learning toolkit. London, UK: Education Endowment Foundation.

Howard-Jones, P. A. (2014). Neuroscience and education: myths and messages. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(12), 817–824. doi: 10.1038/nrn3817

Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1986). From metaprocess to conscious access: Evidence from children’s metalinguistic and repair data. Cognition, 28, 95-147. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(86)90040-5

Kim, M. & Sankey, D. (2017). Philosophy, neuroscience and pre-service teachers’ beliefs in neuromyths: A call for remedial action. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(2), 1-14. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2017.1395736

Immordino-Yang, M. H. & Damasio, A. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Brain, Mind and Education, 1, 3-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-228X.2007.00004.x

Immordino-Yang M. (2015). Emotions, learning, and the brain: Exploring the educational implications of affective neuroscience. New York, NY, US: W.W. Norton & Company.

Izard, V., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Dehaene, S. (2008). Distinct cerebral pathways for object identity and number in human infants. PLOS Biology, 6: e11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060011

Liberman, I. Y. & Liberman, A. M. (1990). Whole language vs. code emphasis: Underlying assumptions and their implications for reading. Annals of Dyslexia, 40, 51-76. doi: 10.1007/BF02648140

Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology. Research and Development, 50(3), 43-59. doi: 10.1007/BF02505024

Midoro, V., Massari, M., & Strisciuglio, C. (2017). Imparare a leggere a tre anni. TD Tecnologie Didattiche, 24(3), 173-182. doi: 10.17471/2499-4324/929

Miranda, S. & Montesano, L. (2021). Prerequisiti della lettura: valutare la consapevolezza fonologica. Giornale Italiano dei Disturbi del Neurosviluppo. Buone prassi per la scuola, la clinica e la ricerca, 6(2), 136-160.

MIUR. (2011). Linee guida per il diritto allo studio degli alunni e degli studenti con DSA. Retrieved from https://www.unimi.it/sites/default/files/2018-07/linee_guida_sui_dsa_12luglio2011.pdf

Montessori M. (1999). La scoperta del bambino. Milano, IT: Garzanti.

Morais, J. (1989). Phonological awareness: A bridge between language and literacy. In D.J. Sawyere & B.J. Fox (Eds.), Phonological awareness in reading: The evolution of current perspective (191-215). New York, NY, US: Springer.

Nota Ministeriale n. 3503 (2016, March 30). Adozione dei libri di testo nelle scuole di ogni ordine e grado -a.s. 2016-2017. Retrieved from https://www.dirittoscolastico.it/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/prot3503.pdf

Padovani, R., Odorici, E., Graziosi, V., Bertelli, B., Iadevaia, M., Bellei, M. F., … Cavazzoni, M. (2018). Sperimentazione del metodo sillabico per insegnare a leggere e scrivere nella scuola primaria. Dislessia, 15(2), 161-172.

Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Posner, M. I. (2004). Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention. London, UK: The Guilford Press.

Rosenshine, B. (2010). Principles of instruction. International Academy of Education. Retrieved from https://orientation94.org/uploaded/MakalatPdf/Manchurat/EdPractices_21.pdf

Sabitzer, B. (2010). Neurodidaktik: Neue Impulse für den Informatikunterricht. In G. Brandhofer (Ed.), 25 Jahre Schulinformatik in Österreich. Zukunft mit Herkunft. Tagungsband (pp. 305-320). Wien, AT: Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft ÖCG.

SNLG -ISS - Sistema Nazionale Linee Guida dell’Istituto Superiore di Sanità (2011). Consensus Conference. Disturbi Specifici dell’apprendimento. Retrieved from https://www.aiditalia.org/Media/Documents/consensus/Cc_Disturbi_Apprendimento.pdf

SNLG -ISS -Sistema Nazionale Linee Guida dell’Istituto Superiore di Sanità (2022). Linea Guida sulla gestione dei Disturbi Specifici dell’apprendimento. Retrieved from https://snlg.iss.it/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/LG-389-AIP_DSA.pdf

Stella, G. & Apolito, A. (2004). Lo screening precoce nella scuola elementare. Può una prova di 16 parole prevedere i disturbi specifici di apprendimento? Dislessia, 1(1), 111-118.

Tancredi, S., Chen, R. S. Y., Krause, C., Abrahmson D., &, Gomez Paloma, G. F. (2021). Getting up to SpEED: Special Education Embodied Design for Sensorially Equitable Inclusion. Education Sciences & Society, 1, 115-136. doi: 10.3280/ess1-2021oa11818

UNESCO. (1951). Conférence internationale de l’instruction publique: procés-verbaux et recommandations convoquée par l’Unesco et le BIE. Genève, CH: Bureau international d’éducation. Paris, FR: Unesco.

Ventriglia, L. (2016). Come insegnare a leggere ai bambini. Presentazione di una metodologia. Form@re. Open Journal per la Formazione in Rete, 2(16), 374-384. doi: 10.13128/formare-17928

What Works Clearinghouse. (2020). What Works Clearinghouse Standards Handbook, Version 4.1. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/referenceresources/WWC-Standards-Handbook-v4-1-508.pdf