Editorial. Quality issues in online higher education
Article Sidebar
Published:
Dec 30, 2019
Keywords:
Editorial, Online Higher Education, Educational Technology, Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL)
Main Article Content
Abstract
Concerns about the quality of education are nothing new. However, in the last decades it has become more apparent, especially with respect to National policies and International Organizations such as the OECD, who insist upon systematic quality criteria for education, and also establishing appropriate evaluation mechanisms for its periodic review. Evaluation of quality in higher education has therefore begun to be a key issue for higher education institutions’ accountability to society. Although there is no clear agreement about the meaning of quality in this context however, obtaining evidence of good practice to achieve quality outcomes has been widely adopted. [...]
Article Details
Section
Editorial
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
References
Brasher, A., Holmes, W., & Whitelock, D. (2017). A means for systemic comparisons of current online education quality assurance tools and systems. CODUR Intellectual Output IO1.A2. Retrieved from http://edulab.uoc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/CODUR-deliverable-IO1-A2.pdf
Doherty, G.D. (2008). On quality in education. Quality Assurance in Education, 16(3), 255-265. doi: 10.1108/09684880810886268
Donovan, T., Bates, T., Seaman, J., Mayer, D., Martel, É., Paul, R., ... & Poulin, R. (2018). Tracking online and distance education in Canadian universities and colleges: 2018. Canadian National Survey of Online and Distance Education [Public Report]. Canadian Digital Learning Research Association. Retrieved from https://onlinelearningsurveycanada.ca/publications-2018/
Harvey, L. & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9-34. Hernández-Armenteros, J., & Pérez-García, J.A. (2018). La Universidad española en cifras (2016/2017)
[PDF file]. Conferencia de Rectores de la Universidades Españolas (CRUE), Madrid. Retrieved from http://www.crue.org/SitePages/La-Universidad-Española-en-Cifras.aspx
Inglis, A. (2005). Quality improvement, quality assurance and benchmarking: comparing two frameworks for managing quality processes in open and distance learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 6(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/ view/221/867
Kirkpatrick, D.L. (1994). Evaluating training programs: the four levels. Whitby, Toronto, ON, CA: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
Martin, F., Polly, D., Jokiaho, A. & May, B. (2017). Global standards for enhancing quality in online learning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 18(2), 1-10, 101-102.
McArdle, G.E. (1999). Training design and delivery. Alexandria, VA, USA: American Society for Training and Development.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies [U.S. Dept. of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development Report]. Center for Technology in Learning. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf
Norton, A., Cherastidtham, I., & Mackey, W. (2019). Risks and rewards: when is vocational education a good alternative to higher education? Melbourne, AU: Grattan Institute. Retrieved from https://grattan.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/919-Risks-and-rewards.pdf
Rubio, M. (2003). Enfoques y modelos de evaluación del e-learning. RELIEVE: Revista ELectrónica de Investigación y EValuación Educativa, 9(2). Retrieved from http://www.uv.es/RELIEVE/v9n2/RELIEVEv9n2_1.htm
Sangrà, A., & Fernández-Michels, P. (2011). Quality perception within corporate e-learning providers in Catalonia. Quality Assurance in Education, 19(4), 375-391. doi: 10.1108/09684881111170087
Schindler, L., Welzant, H., Puls-Elvidge, S., & Crawford, L. (2015). Definitions of quality in higher education: a synthesis of the literature. Higher Learning Research Communications, 5(3), 3-13. doi: 10.18870/hlrc.v5i3.244
Seaman, J. E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade Increase: Tracking Distance Education in the United States [Online Report]. Wellesley, MA, USA: The Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/highered.html
Stufflebeam, D.L., & Shinkfield, J. (1984). Systematic evaluation. A self-instructional guide to theory and practice (Evaluation in Education and Human Services). Berlin, DE: Springer.
Van Slyke, C. Kittner, M., & Belanger, F. (1998). Identifying candidates for distance education: a telecommuting perspective. In Proceedings of the America’s Conference on Information Systems, Baltimore (pp. 666-668).
Doherty, G.D. (2008). On quality in education. Quality Assurance in Education, 16(3), 255-265. doi: 10.1108/09684880810886268
Donovan, T., Bates, T., Seaman, J., Mayer, D., Martel, É., Paul, R., ... & Poulin, R. (2018). Tracking online and distance education in Canadian universities and colleges: 2018. Canadian National Survey of Online and Distance Education [Public Report]. Canadian Digital Learning Research Association. Retrieved from https://onlinelearningsurveycanada.ca/publications-2018/
Harvey, L. & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9-34. Hernández-Armenteros, J., & Pérez-García, J.A. (2018). La Universidad española en cifras (2016/2017)
[PDF file]. Conferencia de Rectores de la Universidades Españolas (CRUE), Madrid. Retrieved from http://www.crue.org/SitePages/La-Universidad-Española-en-Cifras.aspx
Inglis, A. (2005). Quality improvement, quality assurance and benchmarking: comparing two frameworks for managing quality processes in open and distance learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 6(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/ view/221/867
Kirkpatrick, D.L. (1994). Evaluating training programs: the four levels. Whitby, Toronto, ON, CA: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
Martin, F., Polly, D., Jokiaho, A. & May, B. (2017). Global standards for enhancing quality in online learning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 18(2), 1-10, 101-102.
McArdle, G.E. (1999). Training design and delivery. Alexandria, VA, USA: American Society for Training and Development.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies [U.S. Dept. of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development Report]. Center for Technology in Learning. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf
Norton, A., Cherastidtham, I., & Mackey, W. (2019). Risks and rewards: when is vocational education a good alternative to higher education? Melbourne, AU: Grattan Institute. Retrieved from https://grattan.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/919-Risks-and-rewards.pdf
Rubio, M. (2003). Enfoques y modelos de evaluación del e-learning. RELIEVE: Revista ELectrónica de Investigación y EValuación Educativa, 9(2). Retrieved from http://www.uv.es/RELIEVE/v9n2/RELIEVEv9n2_1.htm
Sangrà, A., & Fernández-Michels, P. (2011). Quality perception within corporate e-learning providers in Catalonia. Quality Assurance in Education, 19(4), 375-391. doi: 10.1108/09684881111170087
Schindler, L., Welzant, H., Puls-Elvidge, S., & Crawford, L. (2015). Definitions of quality in higher education: a synthesis of the literature. Higher Learning Research Communications, 5(3), 3-13. doi: 10.18870/hlrc.v5i3.244
Seaman, J. E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade Increase: Tracking Distance Education in the United States [Online Report]. Wellesley, MA, USA: The Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/highered.html
Stufflebeam, D.L., & Shinkfield, J. (1984). Systematic evaluation. A self-instructional guide to theory and practice (Evaluation in Education and Human Services). Berlin, DE: Springer.
Van Slyke, C. Kittner, M., & Belanger, F. (1998). Identifying candidates for distance education: a telecommuting perspective. In Proceedings of the America’s Conference on Information Systems, Baltimore (pp. 666-668).