Assessing a MOOC users experience in a virtual mobility project: preliminary results for quality enhancement

Main Article Content

Antonella Poce
Francesca Amenduni
Mariarosaria Re
Carlo De Medio


Virtual Mobility (VM) stands for institutional ICT-supported activities that trigger or facilitate international collaborative experiences in the context of teaching and learning. Some research experiences report the need to enhance Virtual Mobility based on open education principles. Open education is understood as a mode of undertaking education using digital technologies, included OERs and MOOCs. The goal of the present paper is twofold: first, we describe the quality framework for OERs and MOOCs adopted in the Erasmus+ project Open Virtual Mobility for OER and MOOC; secondly, we present an application of the quality approach in a case study in which experience data from 11 MOOC learners were collected and analyzed to improve its quality.


Article Details

Articles - General topics


Andriessen, J., Baker, M., & Suthers, D. D. (Eds.) (2013). Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. New York, NY, USA: Springer Science & Business Media.

Atenas, J., Havemann, L., & Priego, E. (2014). Opening teaching landscapes: The importance of quality assurance in the delivery of open educational resources. Open Praxis, 6(1), 29-43. doi: 10.5944/openpraxis.6.1.81

Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141-178.

Buchem, I., Konert, J., Carlino, C., Casanova, G., Rajagopal, K., Firssova, O., & Andone, D. (2018). Designing a collaborative learning hub for virtual mobility skills: insights from the European project open virtual mobility. In P. Zaphiris, & A. Ioannou (Eds.), Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Design, Development and Technological Innovation, 5th International Conference, LCT 2018, Part I (pp. 350-375). Cham, CH: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-91743-6_27

Buchem, I., Tur, G. & Urbina, S. (2018). Quality assurance for attainment, assessment and recognition of virtual mobility skills in context of open education. In Proceedings 10th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, Palma, Spain. 2-4 July, 2018 (pp. 945-952). doi: 10.21125/edulearn.2018.0318

Camilleri, A. F., Ehlers, U. D., & Pawlowski, J. (2014). State of the art review of quality issues related to open educational resources (OER). Luxembourg, LU: Publications Office of the EU. doi: 10.2791/80171

Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O’Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15-22). Berlin, DE: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-77750-9_2

Conole, G. (2016). MOOCs as disruptive technologies: strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 50 (edición especial), 1-18. Retrieved from

Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of interactive Media in Education, 2012(3). doi: 10.5334/2012-18

Dietze, S., Sanchez-Alonso, S., Ebner, H., Qing Yu, H., Giordano, D., Marenzi, I., & Pereira Nunes, B. (2013). Interlinking educational resources and the web of data: A survey of challenges and approaches. Program, 47(1), 60- 91. doi: 10.1108/00330331211296312

Easterday, M. W., Rees Lewis, D. G., & Gerber, E. M. (2018). The logic of design research. Learning Research and Practice, 4(2), 131-160. doi: 10.1080/23735082.2017.1286367

European Commission (2019). Erasmus+ Programm Guide. Retrieved from

Firssova, O., & Rajagopal, K. (2018). Open VM Competence Framework. Retrieved from

Gaebel, M., Kupriyanova, V., Morais, R., & Colucci, E. (2014). E-Learning in European higher education institutions. Brussels, BE. Retrieved from

Inamorato dos Santos, A., Punie, Y., Castaño-Muñoz, J. (2016). Opening up education: A support framework for higher education institutions. JRC Science for Policy Report. doi: 10.2791/293408

Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 202-227. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1455

Lowenhal, P. R., & Hodges, C. B. (2015). In search of quality: Using quality matters to analyze the quality of massive, open, online courses (MOOCs). International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5), 83-101. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2348

Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). Instructional quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, 80, 77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.005

McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2013). Educational design research. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 131-140). Springer, New York, NY. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_11

McKenney, S., & Visscher-Voerman, I. (2013). Formal education of curriculum and instructional designers. Educational Designer, 2(6), 1-20. Retrieved from

OECD (2007). Giving knowledge for free: The emergence of open educational resources. Retrieved from:

OECD. (2010). Learning Our Lesson: Review of Quality Teaching in Higher Education. Retrieved from:

Op de Beeck, I., & Van Petegem, W. (2013). Virtual mobility: An alternative or complement to physical mobility ERACON 2011 & 2012 Dual Year Proceedings, Cluj-Napoca, Romania (pp. 151-160). Nicosia, CY EAEC. Retrieved from

Parker, N. K. (2008). The quality dilemma in online education revisited. In T. Andreson (Ed.), The theory and practice of online learning (pp. 305-340). Retrieved from

Pawlowski, J. M. (2007). The quality adaptation model: adaptation and adoption of the quality standard ISO/IEC 19796-1 for learning, education, and training. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 3-16. Retrieved from

Poce, A., Agrusti, F., & Re, M. R. (2015). Sviluppo di uno strumento di valutazione delle risorse aperte (Oers). Cadmo, 2, 81-98. doi: 10.3280/CAD2015-002008

Pond, W. K. (2002). Distributed education in the 21st century: Implications for quality assurance. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(2), 1-8. Retrieved from

Reeves, T. (2006). Design research from a technology perspective. In J. Van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational Design Research (pp. 64-78). London, UK: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203088364

Schön, D. A. (2017). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London, UK: Routledge.

St. Lifer, E. (2018, January 11). Five Ed-Tech Elephants: From OER to equitable access, challenges to the digital revolution persist [School Library Journal Post]. Retrieved from

Tovar Caro, E., & Lesko, I. (2014). Analysis of successful modes for the implementation and use of Open Course Ware (OCW) & Open Educational Resources (OER) in higher education. the virtual mobility case. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 17(1), 131-148. doi: 10.5944/ried.17.1.11577

Villar-Onrubia, D., & Rajpal, B. (2016). Online international learning: Internationalising the curriculum through virtual mobility at Coventry University. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 20(2-3), 75-82. doi: 10.1080/13603108.2015.1067652

Weller, M. (2017). The development of new disciplines in Education – the Open Education example. In G. M. dos Santos Ferreira, L. A. da Silva Rosado, & J. de Sà Carvalho (Eds.), Education and technology: critical approaches Sa (pp. 464–486). Rio de Janeiro, BRA: Universidade Estacio de Sà. Retrieved from

Wilson, G., Abbott, D., De Kraker, J., Salgado Perez, P., Scheltinga, C., & Willems, P. (2011). The lived experience of climate change: Creating open educational resources and virtual mobility for an innovative, integrative and competence-based track at masters level. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(2), 111-123. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-16318-0_59

Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational psychologist, 25(1), 3-17. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2