Main Article Content

Tim Fawns
Clara O'Shea


Research into sustainable assessment highlights that students must not only learn to evaluate their final products and performances but also the processes of learning they engage in while producing these final outputs. However, what is missing in this research is a focus on practices – the specific activities that are undertaken in completing tasks – and on how these are adapted to different, increasingly technologically-mediated environments. The capacity to improvise, to work around or subvert formal or expected procedures, and effectively adjust working practices, is critical for learning to operate across different situations, with different combinations of people, technologies and systems. Drawing on examples from sociomaterial research in educational and clinical environments, we argue that developing evaluative judgement of working practices will help students to overcome some of the challenges of moving between university and professional settings. To this end, we propose a reconfiguration of assessment to encourage visibility, ...

Article Details

Articles - Special Issue
Author Biographies

Tim Fawns, University of Edinburgh

Fellow in Clinical Education

Edinburgh Medical School

Clara O'Shea, University of Edinburgh

Associate Lecturer

Moray House School of Education


Ackland, A., & Swinney, A. (2015). Material matters for learning in virtual networks: A case study of a professional learning programme hosted in a Google+ online community. Research in Learning Technology, 23(1), 1–14. doi: 10.3402/rlt.v23.26677

Ajjawi, R., Molloy, E., Bearman, M., & Rees, C. E. (2017). Scaling up assessment for learning in higher education. In D. Carless (Ed.), The Enabling Power of Assessment (Vol. 5, pp. 129–143). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-3045-1_9

Arrowsmith, V., Lau-Walker, M., Norman, I., & Maben, J. (2016). Nurses’ perceptions and experiences of work role transitions: A mixed methods systematic review of the literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(8), 1735–1750. doi: 10.1111/jan.12912

Bhatt, I. (2017). Classroom digital literacies as interactional accomplishments. In M. Knobel & C. Lankshear (Eds.), Researching New Literacies: Design, Theory, and Data in Sociocultural Investigation (pp. 127–149). New York, NY, USA: Peter Lang.

Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151–167. doi: 10.1080/713695728

Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2012.691462

Boud, D., & Soler, R. (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 400–413. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133

Brennan, N., Corrigan, O., Allard, J., Archer, J., Barnes, R., Bleakley, A., De Bere, S. R. (2010). The transition from medical student to junior doctor: Today’s experiences of tomorrow’s doctors. Medical Education, 44(5), 449–458. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03604.x

Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42. doi: 10.3102/0013189X018001032

Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2002). The social life of information. Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business School Press.

Carless, D. (2007). Learning-oriented assessment: conceptual bases and practical implications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(1), 57–66. doi: 10.1080/14703290601081332

Crook, C., Gross, H., & Dymott, R. (2006). Assessment relationships in higher education: The tension of process and practice. British Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 95–114. doi: 10.1080/01411920500402037

Duchscher, J. E. B. (2009). Transition shock: The initial stage of role adaptation for newly graduated registered nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(5), 1103–1113. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04898.x

Edwards, A., Daniels, H., Gallagher, T., Leadbetter, J., & Warmington, P. (2009). Improving inter-professional collaborations: multi-agency working for children’s wellbeing. New York, NY, USA: Routledge.

Engeström, Y. (2014). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA, USA: Cambridge University Press.

Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Kerosuo, H. (2003). The discursive construction of collaborative care. Applied Linguistics, 24(3), 286–315. doi: 10.1093/applin/24.3.286

Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1–24. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2009.12.002

Falk, A. L., Hopwood, N., & Dahlgren, M. A. (2016). Unfolding practices: A sociomaterial view of interprofessional collaboration in health care. Professions and Professionalism, 7(1), 1–14. doi: 10.7577/pp.1699

Fawns, T., & O’Shea, C. (2018). Distributed learning and isolated testing: Tensions in traditional assessment practices. Proceedings of the 2018 Networked Learning Conference, 132–139. Retrieved from http://www.networkedlearningconference.org.uk/abstracts/papers/fawns_11.pdf

Fenwick, T. (2014). Knowledge circulations in inter-para/professional practice: A sociomaterial enquiry. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 66(3), 264–280. doi: 10.1080/13636820.2014.917695

Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2016). Exploring the impact of digital technologies on professional responsibilities and education. European Educational Research Journal, 15(1), 117–131. doi: 10.1177/1474904115608387

Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3–31. Retrieved from http://insight.glos.ac.uk/tli/resources/lathe/Documents/issue%201/articles/simpson.pdf

Gourlay, L., & Oliver, M. (2018). Student engagement in the digital university: Sociomaterial assemblages. London, UK: Routledge.

Govaerts, M., & van der Vleuten, C. P. (2013). Validity in work-based assessment: Expanding our horizons. Medical Education, 47(12), 1164–1174. doi: 10.1111/medu.12289

Gregory, L. R., Hopwood, N., & Boud, D. (2014). Interprofessional learning at work: What spatial theory can tell us about workplace learning in an acute care ward. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 28(3), 200–205. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2013.873774

Hamilton, E. C., & Friesen, N. (2013). Online education: A science and technology studies perspective. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 39(2), 1–21. doi: 10.21432/T2001C

Harden, R., & Gleeson, F. (1979). Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Medical Education, 13(1), 39–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1979.tb00918.x

de la Harpe, B., Peterson, J. F., Frankham, N., Zehner, R., Neale, D., Musgrave, E., & McDermott, R. (2009). Assessment focus in studio: What is most prominent in architecture, art and design? International Journal of Art and Design Education, 28(1), 37–51.

Higher Education Academy. (2012). A marked improvement transforming assessment in higher education. The Higher Education Academy, 60. Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/assessment/a-marked-improvement

Howe, P. W., & Kumar, K. (2017). A qualitative exploration of anesthesia trainees’ experiences during transition to a children’s hospital. Paediatric Anaesthesia, 27(3), 263–270. doi: 10.1111/pan.13064

Lave, J. (1994). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(3), 149–164. Retrieved from doi: 10.1207/s15327884mca0303_2

Lindberg-Sand, Å., & Olsson, T. (2008). Sustainable assessment? Critical features of the assessment process in a modularised engineering programme. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 165–174.

Macfarlane, B. (2015). Student performativity in higher education: Converting learning as a private space into a public performance. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(2), 338–350. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2014.956697

MacLeod, A., Kits, O., Mann, K., Tummons, J., & Wilson, K. W. (2017). The invisible work of distributed medical education: Exploring the contributions of audiovisual professionals, administrative professionals and faculty teachers. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 22(3), 623–638. doi: 10.1007/s10459-016-9695-4

Mesman, J. (2012). Moving in with care: About patient safety as a spatial achievement. Space and Culture, 15(1), 31–43. doi: 10.1177/1206331211426066

Meyer, R., Van Schalkwyk, S. C., & Prakaschandra, R. (2016). The operating room as a clinical learning environment: An exploratory study. Nurse Education in Practice, 18, 60–72. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2016.03.005

Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 501–517. doi: 10.1080/02602931003786559

Nicol, D. (2014). Guiding principles for peer review: Unlocking learners’ evaluative skills. In C. Kreber, C. Anderson, N. Entwistle, & J. McArthur (Eds.), Advances and Innovations in University Assessment and Feedback (pp. 179–224). Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.

Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. doi: 10.1080/03075070600572090

Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102–122. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2013.795518

Nyström, S., Dahlberg, J., Hult, H., & Dahlgren, M. A. (2016). Enacting simulation: A sociomaterial perspective on students’ interprofessional collaboration. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 30(4), 441–447. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2016.1152234

O’Donovan, B., Rust, C., & Price, M. (2015). A scholarly approach to solving the feedback dilemma in practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, (June 2015), 1–12. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1052774

O’Shea, C., & Fawns, T. (2014). Group connoisseurship: Creating shared understandings of quality in online collaborative assessments. Brookes E-Journal of Learning and Teaching, 6(2).

Oliver, M. (2016). Of clouds and cables: What do students need when they learn with technology? Proceedings of the The 11th International Knowledge Management in Organizations Conference on The Changing Face of Knowledge Management Impacting Society, 1–7. doi: 10.1145/2925995.2926051

Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607081138

Rethans, J., Norcini, J., Baron-Maldonado, B., Blackmore, D., Jolly, B., LaDuca, T., & Southgate, L. (2002). The relationship between competence and performance: Implications for assessing practice performance. Medical Education, 36, 901–909. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01316.x

Ross, J. (2014). Performing the reflective self: Audience awareness in high-stakes reflection. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 219–232. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.651450

Russell, D. R. (2002). Looking beyond the interface: Activity theory and distributed learning. In M. R. Lea & K. Nicoll (Eds.), Distributed Learning: Social and Cultural Approaches to Practice (pp. 64–82). New York, NY, USA: Routledge Falmer.

Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. doi: 10.1007/BF001177

Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535–550. doi: 10.1080/02602930903541015

Sadler, D. R. (2015). Backwards assessment explanations: Implications for teaching and assessment practice. In D. Lebler, G. Carey, & S. D. Harrison (Eds.), Assessment in Music Education: from Policy to Practice (pp. 9–19). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-10274-0_2

Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K., & Savigny, E. von (Eds.). (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. New York: Routledge.

Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 4–13. doi: 10.3102/0013189X027002004

Suchman, L. (2000). Organizing alignment: A case of bridge-building. Organization, 7(2), 311–327. doi: 10.1177/135050840072007

Suchman, L. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions, 2nd edition. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.

Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2017). Developing evaluative judgement : Enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, Online. doi: 10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3